Hiring Experienced vs Inexperienced Employees

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Is it better to hire someone with or without experience?

Hiring decisions should always balance experienced professionals with fresh talent. Using pre-employment tests to make informed choices that align with organizational needs and long-term goals helps this process.

When it comes to hiring, experience often seems like the golden ticket. But is it always the best choice? Should you hire an experienced candidate or take a chance on someone new? 

The answer can significantly impact your company’s growth, productivity, and overall success. But how do you make the right decision? How can you ensure you’re selecting the best candidates, regardless of their experience level?

Experienced Employees: The Proven Track Record

Assess your team’s current makeup: Do you need to balance out experience levels?

Experienced Employees have spent significant time in the industry. They usually have 3+ years of experience and a proven track record in similar roles.

Experienced hires bring a wealth of knowledge and skills to the table. They’ve been there, done that, and have the battle scars to prove it. What are the advantages of hiring seasoned professionals?

Pros of Hiring Experienced Employees:

1. Hit the Ground Running: Experienced hires can start contributing immediately, requiring less training.
2. Industry Insights: They bring valuable knowledge about industry trends and best practices.
3. Established Networks:  Hiring experienced employees usually comes with professional connections that can benefit your company.
4. Effective Mentors: Experienced hires can train less experienced team members.

Disadvantages of Hiring Experienced Employees

However, it’s not all smooth sailing. A study by HBR shows that experience doesn’t always predict a new hire’s success. In fact, experienced hires also come with their own set of challenges:

1. Higher Salary Expectations: Experience often comes with a hefty price tag. Are you prepared to meet their financial demands?
2. Potential Inflexibility: Some experienced employees may be set in their ways. They may resist new methods or the company culture.
3. Risk of Overqualification: They might become bored or unchallenged, leading to lower job satisfaction and higher turnover. Ever heard of the Peter Principle? The higher up the hierarchy ladder an employee climbs, the more likely he is to fail in his new position.

Hiring Inexperienced Employees: The Blank Canvas

Inexperienced employees can offer a fresh perspective and boundless potential. They are newcomers to the field, often recent graduates or career changers, with less than 2 years of relevant experience. Are these unproven candidates worth the investment?

Benefits of Hiring Inexperienced Employees

1. Moldable Mindset: They’re often more adaptable and eager to learn the company’s specific methods.
2. Fresh Perspectives: Hiring inexperienced employees can bring innovative ideas and challenge the status quo.
3. Long-term Potential: By investing in their growth, you may cultivate loyal, long-term employees.
4. Cost-Effective: Generally, inexperienced hires have lower salary expectations.

Challenges of Hiring Inexperienced Employees

1. Longer Training Period: When you’re hiring inexperienced employees, you’ll need to invest more time and resources in their development.
2. Higher Risk of Mistakes: Expect that their lack of experience may lead to more errors initially.
3. Supervision Required: They often need more guidance and oversight. Inexperienced employees can also take longer to become fully productive from day one.

Pro tip: When deciding on experienced vs inexperienced employees, think about your current team. Do you have a team of mostly inexperienced employees who could benefit from the guidance of a seasoned professional? Or do you have a team of experienced employees who could benefit from the fresh perspective and innovative ideas of a new hire? 

Experienced vs Inexperienced Employees: How Pre-Employment Tests Level the Playing Field

So, how do you decide between experienced vs inexperienced employees? This is where the power of pre-employment testing comes into play.

Pre-employment tests are standardized assessments designed to evaluate a candidate’s skills, personality traits, and potential job performance. But why are they crucial when comparing experienced and inexperienced candidates?

Leveling the Playing Field

Skills tests provide objective data that goes beyond what’s on a resume. With the right tests, you can compare candidates based on their actual abilities rather than just their work history. This is especially important in today’s job market, where experience and educational degrees are not the only reliable indicators of job performance. 

Uncovering Hidden Potential

For inexperienced candidates, tests can reveal aptitudes and skills that might not be apparent from their limited work history. For example, do they have the basic computer skills to perform online tasks? How are their attention to detail skills? A computer literacy test for employment or an attention-to-detail test can uncover those hard-skill gems.

Verifying Claimed Expertise

For experienced candidates, tests can verify their claimed skills on resumes. For example, a clerical skills test is invaluable when evaluating admin staff skills.

Predicting Cultural Fit

Personality assessments and workplace behavioral tests can help you determine whether a candidate will fit with your company culture and have the traits needed for specific jobs.

Identifying Learning Agility

Cognitive and reasoning tests can measure a candidate’s ability to learn and adapt quickly. This is a crucial trait for both experienced and inexperienced hires.

A study by Aberdeen Group shows that companies using pre-employment tests are 36% more likely to be satisfied with their new hires. This statistic underscores the value of incorporating testing into your hiring process.

Making the Hiring Decision: A Step-by-Step Guide

Ready to make a more informed hiring decision? Follow these steps:

1. Define the role clearly: What specific skills and qualities are absolutely necessary?
2. Assess your team’s current makeup: Do you need to balance out experience levels?
3. Consider your company’s growth stage: Do you need immediate expertise or long-term potential?
4. Evaluate your training resources: Can you support an inexperienced hire’s development?
5. Implement pre-employment testing: Use objective data to complement resumes and interviews.
6. Conduct thorough interviews: Ask behavioral questions to gauge how candidates apply their skills and knowledge.
7. Check references: Conduct a reference check. Verify claims and gather insights from past employers or educators.

Experienced vs Inexperienced Employees: The Winner

The choice between experienced vs inexperienced employees isn’t an either/or decision, as most companies maintain a healthy mix of both.

Consider this approach:

• Hire experienced employees for leadership and specialized roles where immediate expertise is crucial.
• Consider hiring inexperienced employees for entry-level positions and where fresh perspectives are valuable.
• Use pre-employment tests to identify high-potential candidates in both categories.
• Implement programs where experienced employees can guide and train inexperienced team members.

The ultimate goal? Creating a dynamic workforce that combines experience’s wisdom with fresh talent’s energy.

In the debate between hiring experienced vs inexperienced employees, the real winner is the company that makes informed decisions based on reliable data.

Are you ready to take your hiring process to the next level? Start hiring smarter. Book a consultation with our expert team today!